A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out concerning possible neighbours about the development of the wall at a coastal web page inside a north Dublin suburb, a circumstance which has attracted countrywide consideration pursuing an Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres with a proposed family house at Sutton Strand, exactly where allegations of preparing breaches, environmental worries, and prolonged-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in the courts. The Irish Instances short article about René Collier and the Irish Periods report about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a neighborhood disagreement has developed right into a remarkably publicised authorized struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than building performs at the location on Dublin Street, Sutton, the place Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and a corporation director respectively, seek to construct their household dwelling. The situation has grown to be emblematic of wider disputes along Ireland’s coastline, the place enhancement pressures collide with environmental protections plus the sensitivities of proven residents. In accordance with the Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall remaining produced by their possible neighbours goes further than the boundaries permitted below preparing authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both residents of Dublin Street, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms of their setting up authorization by building a wall outside of the boundaries in their web-site, leading to an encroachment on a Exclusive Place of Conservation. The SAC designation is central for the dispute, therefore locations are topic to demanding controls under European and Irish environmental regulation. Of their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even slight encroachments could have lasting ecological repercussions, specifically in a sensitive coastal setting which include Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny These are in breach of their scheduling permission, and say the wall, and that is partially created, is in the right posture. Their legal crew has characterised the motion being an attempt to delay or frustrate a lawful growth. The pair accuse litigants of seeking to halt homebuilding in an effort to protect their perspective, an allegation that has been recurring in court docket and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the heart of numerous coastal planning disputes, exactly where views of The ocean are each extremely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described spectacular initiatives with the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by ocean in storm to photograph the internet site, In keeping with sworn proof referenced during the Irish Moments. In one account, Rene Collier waded by midsection-substantial h2o for the duration of a storm to photograph the site Irish Occasions, an image which includes given that develop into emblematic with the intensity in the dispute. These steps weren't basically symbolic; they had been meant to Acquire Visible proof on the wall’s situation relative to tidal traces and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site within the sea Irish Instances reported, describing how The 2 Adult males entered the drinking water throughout critical weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by storm drinking water to photograph the internet site turned Just about the most putting descriptions to arise from court reporting. The Irish Occasions posting about accountant Paul Feely noted that these kinds of actions had been cited to display the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall extended into a place affected by tidal motion, strengthening their argument which the SAC was remaining encroached upon.
The situations at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 have been covered intimately with the nationwide press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Times 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Times January 27 2026 became extensively searched phrases as audience sought to grasp the track record and implications of the case. On that day, the High Court read further more submissions on no matter whether interim orders need to be granted to halt building pending a complete hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a important instant while in the authorized timeline.
With the Main from the dispute is actually a disagreement in excess of boundaries, preparing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely retain the wall, as made, goes beyond what was authorised and intrudes into protected land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, has been called meticulous in his evaluation of organizing documents, maps, and ailments hooked up to your permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both equally pressured that their motion is inspired by concern for environmental safety and adherence to arranging regulation. They reject claims that the case is about preserving A personal perspective, insisting as an alternative that it is about making certain that enhancement at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological boundaries. In affidavits, they've explained their extended-standing relationship to the realm as well as their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the other facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a couple basically endeavoring to make a family property in accordance with the law. They deny that the wall encroaches on the Special Region of Conservation and say that all operates happen to be completed based on Qualified information and authorized options. Their lawyers have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the remarkable actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, which includes getting into the sea during a storm, will not change the fundamental points.
The situation has also elevated broader questions about how setting up disputes are settled in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute more than design of wall at coastal site is now a shorthand description for a scenario that a lot of observers see as ever more typical. As sea stages increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation amongst personal land, public foreshore, and guarded habitats has started to become extra contentious.
The Irish Situations write-up about René Collier observed that the businessman had Beforehand been involved with area advocacy on arranging and environmental problems, while not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Instances posting about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how individuals from extremely unique Skilled backgrounds can find them selves aligned in this kind of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some stories spell their names, have become synonymous With all the Sutton Strand case.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website from your sea Irish Times protection emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded via waistline-high drinking water through a storm to photograph the site Irish Instances and René Collier waded by way of midsection-significant drinking water during a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Situations are phrases that appeared repeatedly in coverage, reflecting equally the Actual physical truth of the coastline along with the symbolic character with the act. For supporters of the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated dedication; for critics, they illustrated what they see as an too much method.
Since the High Court proceedings keep on, the end result stays uncertain. The court should decide if the wall as created complies with arranging permission and no matter if any encroachment into a Particular Location of Conservation has occurred. The lawful arguments are elaborate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal details, and scheduling ailments. Still the human factor remains central: neighbours who must Are living along with each other extensive following the legal costs are actually paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than design performs at the site on Dublin Road, Sutton, but the implications of the situation extend outside of that address. For planners, builders, and residents alike, the dispute serves for a reminder of the significance of clarity in planning permissions and sensitivity in coastal progress. In addition, it underscores how immediately a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when essential concerns which include environmental safety and residence legal rights are perceived for being at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand continues to be a spot of pure elegance and contested boundaries. The wall for the centre of the dispute stands partially created, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved legal queries. Irrespective of whether it'll in the long run be altered, eradicated, or finished as planned will depend upon the courtroom’s results. Right until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will most likely proceed to Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site from the sea Irish Times seem in headlines, connected indelibly to The most carefully watched arranging disputes in north Dublin lately.